Antitrust Investigation against E-Commerce Platforms in Goods Category in India: A Review from Timeliness Perspective

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Dr. Navdeep Singh Suhag
Abhishek Raj

Abstract

With the entry of e-commerce, the traditional way in which business was conducted in a marketplace has changed considerably. Although, e-commerce offers a multitude of pro-competitive benefits, yet it is vulnerable to anti-competitive practices owing primarily to its characteristic features such as strong network effects, high innovation rates, fast-changing technologies, etc. In this paper, we review antitrust cases against e-commerce platforms in goods category, in light of the fast-moving nature of online businesses and the importance of timeliness in completion of investigation. We have adopted a doctrinal research methodology in this paper. Based on the findings, we suggest that as per the dynamic situation of markets, it is imperative that a time-bound investigation may be completed so that the true picture comes out. We recommend a holistic investigation by the Director General in such cases and the use of negotiated remedies in the form of settlements and commitments.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Navdeep Singh Suhag, D., & Raj, A. (2020). Antitrust Investigation against E-Commerce Platforms in Goods Category in India: A Review from Timeliness Perspective. Competition Commission of India Journal on Competition Law and Policy, 1, 53–77. https://doi.org/10.54425/ccijoclp.v1.10

References

  1. Almunia, J. (2012). Statement of VP Almunia on the Google antitrust investigation.European Commission. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/SPEECH_12_372
  2. Bose, A., and Parsheera, S. (2016). Network Effects in India’s Online Businesses: A Competition Law Analysis.
  3. CCI. (2020). Market Study on E-Commerce in India Key Findings and observations.New Delhi: Competition Commission of India.
  4. CLRC. (2019). Report of the Competition Law Review Committee.Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India.
  5. DPIIT. (2019, February). Draft National e-Commerce Policy.Ministry of Commerce and Industry, Government of India.
  6. Dubé, J.P., Hitsch, G. J., and Chintagunta, P. (2008). Tipping and Concentration in Markets with Indirect Network Effects. Marketing Science, 216-249.
  7. European Parliament. (2019, October 8). Hearing of Margrethe Vestager.Brussels.
  8. Government of India. (2012). The Competition Act, 2002.
  9. Gregory, R. W., Henfridsson, O., Kaganer, E., and Kyriakou, H. (2020). The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Data Network Effects for Creating User Value. Academy of Management Review.
  10. IBEF. (2019). Indian Ecommerce Industry Report.India Brand Equity Foundation (IBEF).
  11. Keelery, S. (2020, March 26). Market size of e-commerce industry across India from 2014 to 2017, with forecasts until 2027. Statista. Retrieved from: https://www.statista.com/statistics/792047/india-e-commerce-market-size/
  12. OECD. (2000). Competion Issues in Online Commerce.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
  13. OECD. (2019). Review of the Recommendation of the Council concerning Effective Action against Hard Core Cartels.Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
  14. Parsheera, S., Shah, A., and Bose , A. (2017). Competition Issues in India’s Online Economy. NIPFP Working Paper, 6.
  15. Posner, R. (2000). Antitrust in the New Economy. John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 106, 9. University of Chicago Law & Economics.
  16. Prakhar, P., Gandhi, N., Chatterjee, P., Reis, S., Ananth, M., and Jain, P. (2015). Competition Law in India: A Report on Jurisprudential Trends.Nishith Desai Associates.
  17. Redseer. (2020, July). Accelerated Digitization In India Internet Post COVID - Part 2. Retrieved from: https://redseer.com/newsletters/accelerated-digitization-in-india-internet-post-covid-part-2/
  18. Ruutu, S., Casey, T., and Kotovirta, V. (2017). Development and competition of digital service platforms: A system dynamics approach. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 119-130.
  19. SAP; ECommerce Foundation. (2019, March 26). Ecommerce Report 2019: India.SAP; E-Commerce Foundation.
  20. Statista. (2020, August). eCommerce. Retrieved from: https://www.statista.com/outlook/243/119/ecommerce/india
  21. Tadelis, S. (2016). Two-Sided e-commerce Marketplaces and the Future of Retailing. Handbook on the Economics of Retailing and Distribution.
  22. Unicommerce. (2020). E-Commerce Trends Report.